| I. |
Thai listed companies are family-owned
and managed |
| |
1. Shareholding structure |
| |
|
Large differentiation among listed companies : average free float
- Overall market : 37% |
| |
|
- Large companies (SET 50) : 49% |
| |
|
- Non-SET 50 : minimum of 15% |
| |
|
Large companies (SET 50) accounts for 75% of market cap |
| |
2. Management structure |
| |
McKinsey survey (April 2002) of top 130 companies found
strong performance in board
practices e.g.: |
| |
 |
76% of surveyed companies had a board with a majority of non-executive
directors |
| |
|
68% of companies had boards that comprised 25-50% independent directors |
| |
|
22% of companies had an independent chairman, compared to 15% in
the US |
| |
3. Cross shareholding & Intra-group
transactions |
| |
 |
Less problems in large firms |
| |
|
Subject to disclosure requirements |
| |
|
Loans to directors prohibited under company law |
| |
|
Shareholders' approval required for transactions of over 3% of net
tangible asset with view from independent financial advisor (FA subject
to SEC supervision) |
| |
 |
"Unjustifiable" transactions are monitored and discouraged
prior to commitment |
| |
|
Revised connected transactions rules to be in force by Q2 2003 |
| |
| II. |
Governance of Privatized State-Owned Enterprises
|
| |
Government as major shareholder of SOEs fully realizes
that CG has direct impact on the
value of its shares in SOEs. It is, therefore, in the government's
own interest to enhance
CG and efficiency of these entities to maximize the long term value
of its assets.
Hence, in making any decision relating to listed SOEs, the government
shall give high regards to impact on the share price as well as fairness
to the general shareholders. |
| |
|
Intervention of business policies? |
| |
- Sort SOEs with social objectives out of privatization programs |
| |
- Cabinet resolution not to intervene business policies or management
of listed privatized companies e.g. PTT |
| |
- Require large SOEs to use electronic procurement to increase transparency
and reduce cost - TOT, THAI |
| |
- Policy to reduce government guarantee to SOEs' loans - needs for
SOEs to improve efficiency |
| |
 |
Appointment of directors & CEO |
| |
|
- Clear government policy to appoint only competent and professional
persons |
| |
|
- Management of appointed persons has to be transparent and subject
to checking mechanism |
| |
|
- Appointment of key positions in major SOEs go through independent
nomination committee |
| |
|
- Policy to have ESOP in privatized companies and large proportion
of share distribution to the public to counter balance state ownership |
| |
Information disclosure for listed SOEs |
| |
|
- Companies with share allotment to foreign investors has to issue
IAS financial statement audited by independent auditing firm |
| |
|
- Annual reports prepared in Thai & English |
| |
|
- Company's website for investor information |
| |
|
- Encourage CG rating |
| |
|
| III. |
Lack of Law Enforcement |
| |
Enforcement was actual weakness i.e. no management of
listed companies has been jailed, but |
| |
|
Wrongdoings have been sanctioned by other means |
| |
 |
Administrative sanctions: SEC has been active and quite effective
in making changes, e.g |
| |
|
- Suspension of professionals that failed to meet their due professional
standards - auditors, financial advisors |
| |
|
- Blacklisting wrongdoers from being management of listed companies
or companies seeking to offer securities |
| |
 |
Financial penalties: fines imposed on long list of important cases
like insider trading. Wrongdoers included large investors, reputable
businessmen in the top wealthy families, politicians, minister, etc.
|
| |
|
Criminal punishment: Takes time and involves many parties but changes
are happening. |
| |
|
- Short-term: Order that decision whether to prosecute important
financial cases be made collectively by police officer, public prosecutor
and regulator (SEC/ BOT /MOF as the case may be)
- Long-term: (a) law amendment to expedite process and let a special
unit/regulators have more investigative power (b) increase administrative
and civil sanctions |
| |
|
|